HOME THE AFFLICTED PURPOSE? .PHOTOGRAPHY SELECTED WORK & PRESS ARCHIVES BLOG FIRST MAGAZINE

 

POSTED : SEPT. 12, 2008
+mmm
 
  **WARNING OF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILTY REGARDING DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS MADE BY UK RESIDENT GRAHAM BROWN-MARTIN.

 

THE INTERESTED PUBLIC IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT ANY PUBLISHING, PUBLIC ENDORSEMENT OR DISPLAY OF DEFAMATORY MATERIALS PROVIDED BY UK RESIDENT GRAHAM BROWN-MARTIN WILL BE CITED IN LEGAL PROCEDINGS THAT ARE CURRENTLY PROCEEDING AGAINST HIM.

BE FURTHER ADVISED THAT ANY MATERIALS PUBLISHED BY YOU WHICH HAVE BEEN SUPPLIED BY GRAHAM BROWN-MARTIN REGARDING THE COMPLAINTANT PETER DEAN RICKARDS WILL BE SUBJECT TO SCRUTINY UNDER BRITISH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAW.

IF IT IS FOUND THAT YOU HAVE PUBLISHED OR DISPLAYED DEFAMATORY MATERIALS BY GRAHAM BROWN-MARTIN, YOU AND/OR YOUR COMPANY WILL BE SUBJECT TO LIABILITY AND YOU WILL BE PERSUED AGRESSIVELY IN THE COURTS.

SHOULD YOU CHOOSE TO PUBLISH DEFAMATORY MATERIALS BY GRAHAM BROWN MARTIN, IT WOULD BE IN YOUR BEST INTEREST TO TAKE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:

DEFAMATION ACT OF 1996 (UK)

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts1996/ukpga_19960031_en_1

ACCORDING TO LIBEL LAW IN THE UK. IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT LIBEL HAS BEEN COMMITTED, THE COMPLAINTANT MUST SHOW :

* that the words were published to a third party ie to someone other that the complainant; (THAT IS, ANY PERSON OR ORGANISATION THAT DISPLAYS OR PUBLISHES GRAHAM BROWN-MARTIN'S DEFAMATORY MATERIAL ABOUT THE COMPLAINTANT PETER DEAN RICKARDS)


* that the meaning was defamatory of the claimant;


* that the complainant was identifiable by name or by innuendo from the publication;


* and, in cases where the defendant relies on privilege from being sued, as a defence, the complainant must prove malice to overcome this defence.

 

 

FINALLY (so there is no mistake):

GRAHAM BROWN-MARTIN IS THE PROPRIETOR OF THE FOLLOWING WEBSITES:

HTTP://WWW.AMMOCITY.COM

HTTP://WWW.HANDHELDLEARNING.CO.UK

HOME THE AFFLICTED PURPOSE? .PHOTOGRAPHY SELECTED WORK & PRESS ARCHIVES BLOG FIRST MAGAZINE